Options
Old newbie!
EJatOU
Member Posts: 1
Hi y’all. Just decided to start hanging out here to bounce stuff off folks. Found an interesting graphic from an article about modeling frequency response for CT and TA activation levels. Wanted to share this graphic.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35265343/
This is only showing how frequency is affected by two dimensions of the voice box, but it opens up some very interesting thoughts. Draw a curve on this graph, this is one “possible” path from our lowest to highest pitch. Each path implies a different gradient of “balance” between CT and TA, for some paths the frequency rises quickly. Not drawing any conclusions, or inferring the efficiency, just the paths, some seem like they would force the pitch to change too rapidly to be easily controlled. Any thoughts on this?
EJ
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35265343/
This is only showing how frequency is affected by two dimensions of the voice box, but it opens up some very interesting thoughts. Draw a curve on this graph, this is one “possible” path from our lowest to highest pitch. Each path implies a different gradient of “balance” between CT and TA, for some paths the frequency rises quickly. Not drawing any conclusions, or inferring the efficiency, just the paths, some seem like they would force the pitch to change too rapidly to be easily controlled. Any thoughts on this?
EJ